What To Do With Your Posts — Plus Some Further Examples

Hi all,

Thanks for posting your historical examples here. As I mentioned, this is also going to form part of the Scalar project. While we’ve mainly worked on the Scalar project in class, there are two activities related to Section I that I’m going to ask you to perform out of class:

Also, I wanted to contribute a couple of pieces that I recently came across that seem relevant to the Section I theme:

Instructor Post: Scientists on Film

Thanks to all who have posted and commented for their thoughtful responses to the reading. One theme that emerged repeatedly in student blog posts this week was the portrayal of Victor in film adaptations of Frankenstein. The 1931 film was important in establishing the “mad scientist” as a standard character type and Branaugh’s film owes much both to the “mad scientist” tradition and to the more recent emergence of the “hero scientist” in film adaptations.

Shelley’s novel is one of the most important early fictional portrayals of a scientist, and it appeared just as science and medicine were begin to develop into the professional disciplines that they are today. Much attention has been paid recently to how scientists are portrayed in contemporary film. In this Big Think post, researcher Matthew Nisbet reports on his study of portrayals of scientists in film. This study found a recent “trend towards an overwhelmingly positive image for scientists in prime-time television.” Nisbet ties this trend to larger shifts in social perceptions of scientists, highlighting a recent study that found that significantly fewer Americans held negative views of scientists in 2002 compared to 1985. Nisbet’s study identifies four major types of portrayals of scientists in film: “Scientists as Dr. Frankenstein,” “Scientists as powerless pawns,” “Scientists as eccentric and anti-social geeks,” and “Scientists as heroes.”

For a different take on portrayals of scientists in film, see this HuffPost article that argues that Hollywood continues to wage a “War on Science” with largely negative depictions of scientists. (His reference to Breaking Bad does make me wonder if we might find some similarities in the rise and fall of Walter White and Victor Frankenstein…)

We might also ask (indeed we will ask in upcoming classes!) whether Shelley’s novel is, itself, anti-science.


Finally, it would seem remiss of me to ask you think about Frankenstein in film without acknowledging how often its been the target of satire. Of course, these films more often satirize the “mad scientist” of the 1931 film than Shelley’s novel. Below are clips from two of the most memorable send-ups: Mel Brooks’s Young Frankenstein and Tim Curry as Dr. Frank-n-furter from The Rocky Horror Picture Show.

 

 

Welcome!

Welcome to the class blog. This is where you’ll be submitting blog posts as well as responding to posts by your fellow classmates. Posts should be between 250-500 words (you can check your word count here.)